 |
|
 |
 |
| |
|
 |
Comments and Appeals to Sequoia National Forest and other Agencies about Projects that Affect the Southern Sierra Nevada
Sequoia ForestKeeper assures environmentally sound compliance with the laws through participation in project-level planning, commenting, appealing,
and when necessary litigating proposed projects that could negatively affect the ecosystems of the southern Sierra Nevada, including the Giant Sequoia National Monument and Forest (GSNM). Comments specifically about GSNM projects are found here. http://www.sequoiaforestkeeper.org/comments_and_appeals.aspx
Click on any of the links below to view our latest comments and appeals about projects in Sequoia National Forest and Southern Sierra Nevada lands.
Comments and Appeals 17 March 2017
15 March 2017 15 March 2017
27 February 2017
14 February 2017 - updated and corrected submission
In the previous January 17, 2017 submission by Wasteful Unreasonable
Methane Uprising, Sequoia ForestKeeper a spreadsheet set concerning
global GHG emissions and global surface temperature change values was
submitted. A few minor errors concerning notes on Sheet 1, lines 57, 58,
and 70 have been corrected, as well as a few other changes have been
incorporated.
1. Recalculated Anthropogenic GHG Emissions Global Surface Temperature Change 1950-2016
Attachments
12 January 2017
CARB Natural Working Lands Modeling comment on the urgent need to increase net carbon sequestration.
Find other comments posted about the CARB lands modeling here.
21 November 2016
19 September 2016
13 September 2016
25 August 2016
17 August 2016
26 May 2016
Attachments:
Letter from Center for Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law Foundation to CARB on their Proposed Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy and Draft
New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Myles R. Allen, et al. { Allen et al on SLCP GWP 2016} Offsetting methane emissions — An alternative to emission equivalence metrics.
25 May 2016
The wildlife and habitats of this world cannot take much more assault from humans that refuse to let nature live. Without nature we will all perish.
13 April 2016
March 31, 2016
March 15, 2016
March 3, 2016
February 4, 2016
(February first was a very busy day commenting on the Sequoia-Sierra National Forest Plan Revision Species of Concern (or lack of concern as evidenced by the Forest Service paying little heed to the Best Available Science))
SFK discusses in brief 25 species of concern that are missing from the Forest Service draft list.
February 1, 2016
February 1, 2016
Sierra Forest Legacy, Center for Biological Diversity, California Native Plant Society, Bristlecone Chapter, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Inyo, Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, The Wilderness Society, Forest Issues Group Sierra Club, Range of Light Group (Toiyabe Chapter) Sierra Club, Tehipite Chapter, Sierra Club, Western Watersheds Project, Friends of the River, CalWild/California Wilderness Coalition, and Mono Lake Committee
Submitted general concerns about the approach and documentation for the determination of Species of Conservation Concern and comments related to the determinations for individual species.
February 1, 2016
These comments are submitted in addition to the comments submitted by Sierra Forest Legacy on behalf of multiple organizations on the Draft Proposed SCC lists for the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests.
February 1, 2016
January 28, 2016
January 27, 2016
Attach J - Summit Star Tulip Occurrences
Attach K - Summit Species
Attach L - Ice Project CSO PAC Map
Attach O - Summit CE B alta sierrae 2016
Attach P - Summit CE-A gentilis Record
Attachment A - March 27, 2014
Attachment B - September 11, 2013
December 29, 2015
November 23, 2015
November 20, 2015
October 19, 2015
October 16, 2015
July 29, 2015
Please address the petition by including the following subject heading:
RE: June 8, 2015 Temporary Urgency Change Petition Concerning SWP/CVP and Water Deliveries, in relation to the April 6, 2015 TUCO
July 6, 2015
These two pdfs contain the SFK and WURU objections that were submitted
as an addendum to our previous complaints that current SWRCB orders,
which enable water diversions to commercial industry, damage the
environment without regard to impacts to wildlife or the public trust.
The
use of irrigated water for livestock feed crop production is both
wasteful and unreasonable during this time of drought in California;
such use also conflicts with the “waste or unreasonable use” section of
the California Constitution.
May 12, 2015
April 1, 2015
Tobias Project FEIS
Scoping Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper ®, Kern-Kaweah Chapter of the Sierra
Club, & Western Watersheds Project
December 1, 2014
October 17, 2014
September 30, 2014
Travel Analysis Process Comments for Sequoia ForestKeeper
& Sierra Club
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|